answer to the epicurean paradox

Then He is malevolent. The title says it all. Here it is: "Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Consider what the paradox says in the very first sentence: either God cannot abolish evil or God chooses not to. The Epicurean Paradox. 15000 Audrey Thornhill. Lactantius attributes this trilemma to Epicurus in De Ira Dei: God, he says, either wishes to take away evils, and is unable; or He is able, and is unwilling; or He is neither willing nor able, or He is both willing and able. The supposed theological one? -> yes -> then why didn't he. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. Answers should be reasonably substantive. "But know this, that in the last days critical times hard to deal with will be here. If He is neither able nor willing Whether or not God exists is probably the most important question of all human philosophy. Check out the whole thing in the article below. Is he able, but not willing? But in what manner God permits or wills sin, this we are not to know; for He has not revealed it. 34 protons and 36 electrons Express your answer as an ion. (Epicurean paradox question) User Info: bidas100. yes /no? Aye, how could He permit it if it was not His will to permit it? So God isn’t evil even though He permits and therefore wills evil to be done. Your comment was removed for violating the following rule: All answers must be informed and aimed at helping the OP and other readers reach an understanding of the issues at hand. The “Epicurean paradox” is a version of the problem of evil. By signing up, you'll get thousands of step-by-step solutions to your homework questions. Philosophy Theories Philosophy Quotes Problem Of Evil Magical Thinking Atheism Critical Thinking Thought Provoking Science Thoughts. Genesis 50:20 But as for you, ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good, to bring to pass, as it is this day, to save much people alive. The most common answer to the epicurean paradox, which is “if god is all powerful, yet all good, how can he allow evil” is that doing so would violate the free will of humans. by Makaveli08: 10:26am On Nov 24, 2016 The logical problem of evil is considered by most philosophers today to have been refuted by Alvin Plantinga's freewill defense. Clement attempted to answer these questions ontologically through dualism, an idea found in the Platonic school, that is by presenting two realities, one of God and Truth, another of human and perceived experience. Good and bad/evil actions done by living beings are, at least partly, out of choice. Ponderer. It functions as a justification for why one shouldn’t believe in a good God, or a God that theists usually hold to. it's logically fallacious. That's it. Epicurean paradox. And if God does not exist there is no basis to complain about evil - as there would not be objectively any such thing as evil. God@gmail.com will god return my email. Then whence cometh evil. If God is real then why do we have a funny bone that isn't funny? for the Epicurean paradox were found. Then whence cometh evil? St. Paul himself would not and could not know it, saying, Rom. “Epicurus is a key figure in the development of science and the scientific method because of his insistence that nothing should be believed, except that which was tested through direct observation and logical deduction.” That is not to say they always make the better choice but this does say at least the choice is there. It's illogical. To this I would herewith reply that he wrongs me, and as he is otherwise full of lies, so also he does not speak the truth in this matter. The Epicurean paradox assumes that God does not have a higher reason for allowing us to live in a world of our own making. Which version of God do you find more favorable. Which is … God has many known attributes, and by adding just one of them destroys the "Epicurean paradox". The Epicurean paradox. Then why call Him God? Welcome to r/askphilosophy. Hi, here on the forum guys advised a cool Dating site, be sure to register - you will not REGRET it Love-Angels, Start making thousands of dollars every week just using this robot. lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of God... Matthew 22:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. The whole wicked and impotent part is just an opinion, not an objective fact. Re: The "Epicurean Paradox… “God,” he says, “either wishes to take away evils, and is unable; or He is able, and is unwilling; or He is neither willing nor able, or He is both willing and able.”. It's one of my favorite quotes and I'd like to hear a reasoned answer. Haitian Men, Dominican Men, and Jamaican Men are the world's most faithful men? Solution for Peace. Sameerian answers to Epicurean paradox. The ... — The Epicurean paradox, ~300 BCE Is God central to Peace in the world or No? More memes, funny videos and pics on 9GAG. The epi curean paradox must not be viewed in a negative way as in the absence of God but rat her be seen as a means to recognize God. sodium phosphide Express your answer as a chemical formula. Epicurus expressed problem of evil or "the Epicurean paradox" while questioning the omnipotent nature of God. Come let us have a civil discussion! 2.God is omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good. Therefore I beseech you in case this spirit should trouble you much with the lofty question regarding the secret will of God,to depart from him and to speak thus: 'Is it too little that God instructs us in His public [proclaimed] will, which He has revealed to us? God isn't omnipotent. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread. Perhaps you can guide me to a good answer posted previously? Death itself? The truth be … However In the Pit, The Void, The Darknesseternial seperation can be found. Epicurus was one of the first western philosophers to propose "Problem of Evil", also known as the Epicurean paradox. My understanding of Hindu philosophy and my belief is that good and evil are two sides of the same coin. Now the Epicurean paradox is basically a restatement of the problem of evil which is. The answer I think is very very simple but depends upon basic assumptions and understanding of the nature of God itself. The "Epicurean Paradox" Posted by Ponderer . Message List New Topic. I apologise in advance for the insensitive and insulting nature of the web site address. Link - - https://moneylinks.page.link/6SuK. You know dipstick if you are going to ask people about a something you should post it All rights reserved. The paradox doesn't address that. He can’t stop a thief from stealing someone’s money because humans should have free will. 9, 20: 'O man, who art thou that repliest against God?' Epicurean Paradox. It only considers two options; it doesn't consider (for sake of argument) that maybe God is allowing evil or perhaps there's a reason why the evil is there in the first place. Then he is not omnipotent. Through the whole compass of human knowledge, there are no inferences more certain and infallible than these. 5. There does happen to be a response to the problem of evil - what is here framed as the Epicurean paradox - a response which I, as an atheist, find more palatable than most. Other legacies of Epicurus include but are not limited to: pleasure and suffering being the embodiment of good and evil (including gluttonous pleasure as a form of suffering and experiencing some suffering as a means to greater pleasure), a formulation of the Ethic of Reciprocity (a.k.a. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Is he able, but not willing? Would the people who wrote ancient books like the Bible know more about the universe than today's scientists? Acts 26:8 Why should it be thought a thing incredible with you, that God should raise the dead? The “Epicurean paradox” or “Riddle of Epicurus” is a version of the problem of evil. Is he neither able nor willing? "The so-called riddle itself is a false dilemma. In what way, however, He permits or wills sin, this we shall leave unanswered (sollen wir gehen lassen). tuk22. The Epicurean Paradox: If God is willing to prevent evil, but is not able to then he is not omnipotent. Therefore take heed that you abide by that which is needful, and which God has commanded us to know, as the wise man says: 'Do not inquire for that which is too high for you, but always remain with that which God has commanded you,'We all have work enough to learn all our lifetime God's command and His Son Christ." Then he is not omnipotent. Friend: "If God is willing to prevent evil, but is not able to, 964. I cannot accept that free will is the answer to God’s hands off approach to evil harming his oh so beloved children. See "the problem of evil" and "theodicy" https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evil/#The. if you make that circle back to "then why didn't he, you're again met with the option of going left. Re: The "Epicurean Paradox" December 16, 2011 07:27PM Moderator Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 47,655 Could you expound on that a tad more please, tuk? What paradox? The Epicurean Paradox part begins with the premise, “Evil Exists,” then asks, “Can God Prevent Evil?”, “Does God know about all the Evil?”, and “Does God want to prevent Evil?” These are not quite Epicurus’s questions; neither in Lactantius nor Hume’s versions. Please read our rules before commenting and understand that your comments will be removed if they are not up to standard or otherwise break the rules. It might seem to follow but I don’t accept it does. - Results (8 votes) God isn't good. The article in the third link also destroys this argument against the existence of God. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. This isn't my answer, but it is a Christian answer: Is he both able and willing? Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Textual analysis was used as a methodology to describe and interpret the content, structure, and functions of the messages contained in various texts The paper aimed to fully answer and give definite responses to what may be a challenging “Epicurean paradox”. Epicurean paradox. Epicurus (341-270 BCE) was an ancient Greek philosopher known today (particularly in skeptical circles) for providing what some claim is a knockdown argument against belief in God. Going back to point 6, man in the end is responsible for how he treats other people. Weknowtheanswer.com © 2014. Then he is not omnipotent. Bible). If you're going to call something evil, okay, but you need to establish on what basis something is evil. Epicurus died a couple of centuries before the birth of Jesus and Christianity, so if he really is the originator of this conundrum then it isn’t specifically aimed at the Church, but it is a philosophical question which still applies to our society today. "His wisdom is infinite: He is never mistaken in choosing the means to any end: But the course of nature tends not to human or animal felicity: Therefore it is not established for that purpose. He presented me with the Paradox, and I don't think my answer now would be as good as it was then, so I'll just copy and paste that part of the conversation! Catherine Wilson - How To Be an Epicurean - Duration: 43:08. For who compels Him to permit it? can I email god ? The article in the second link below explains something about Epicurean philosophy. It places the problem of evil on God rather than man. The Epicurean paradox or riddle of Epicurus or Epicurus' trilemma is a version of the problem of evil. bidas100 2 years ago #1. Why, then, do you gull us seeking to lead us into that which we are forbidden to know, are unable to know, and which you do not know yourself? Article by 9GAG. Cookies help us deliver our Services. It's surprising that educated people copy and paste it without embarrassment. Let the manner in which that comes to pass be commended to God; it suffices us to know that He desires no sin. there's one thing that bothers me with this flow chart. Then He is not omnipotent. A false dilemma is a type of informal fallacy that involves a situation in which limited alternatives are considered, when in fact there is at least one additional option. (E. 53, 345; St. L. 10, 1531;Weimar 18, 549f.). 8. It ignores free will. This will has been revealed to us, and it is necessary for us to know it. If God is willing to prevent evil, but is not able to Message List New Topic. 6. by oaroloye ( m ): 12:32pm On Nov 24 , 2016 3.A perfectly good being would want to prevent all evils. but then "free-will" doesn't mage sense to arrive at the left choice again. I don’t agree that if God is able to prevent evil but not willing to prevent it He’s therefore malevolent. If He is able, but not willing Does God exist? https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evil/#The. Last I checked, man is free to commit evil or good. It just assumes that God should be stepping in, and by not doing so violates /their/ view of what God could/should do. Luther discussed this and made a distinction between God’s revealed will which forbids evil being done, and His hidden will which wills that evil is done but not in a way we can understand. Nor do I doubt that he will quote me to you as saying that God desires sin. 7. Lactantius attributes this trilemma to Epicurus in De Ira Dei, 13, 20-21: God, he says, either wishes to take away evils, and is unable; or He is able, and is unwilling; or He is … If he is able, but not willing then he is malevolent.… But he would not admit that, although God does not desire sin, He nevertheless permits it to happen, and such permission certainly does not come to pass without His will. 4.An omniscient being knows every way in which evils can come into existence. Then he is malevolent. Then He is malevolent. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. If He is both able and willing Please read our rules before commenting and understand that your comments will be removed if they are not up to standard or otherwise break the rules. I want to claim entry to win $600.00 a week for life pch gwy no. Re: The Epicurean Paradox. /r/askphilosophy aims to provide serious, well-researched answers to philosophical questions. I don't see how God could even come close to blame in light of this." Reply Quote. Answers must portray an accurate picture of the issue and the philosophical literature. 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, haughty, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, disloyal, 3 having no natural affection, not open to any agreement, slanderers, without self-control, fierce, without love of goodness, 4 betrayers, headstrong, puffed up with pride, lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of God, 5 having an appearance of godliness but proving false to its power; and from these turn away" (2 Timothy 3:1-5. I bring this up only because Hume himself (a philosopher atheists love to quote) admitted to the possibility: Answer: You can't. The existence of free will seems the most persuasive to me at least. Those parts are nothing more than a slight-of-hand that add nothing themselves and suffer from their own logical inconsistencies. It employs logical non sequiturs. — end Epicurean Paradox — My take on it is as follows: Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the askphilosophy community. Then whence cometh evil. "Epicurean paradox" 25% (2 votes) 2. RE: Epicurean Paradox March 30, 2012 at 9:40 am Cutting down on all the excuses, redefinitions, rationalizations, evasions... the blah-di-blah and the yack-yack-yack, what it … The servant is not to know his master's secrets but what his master enjoins upon him, much less is a poor creature to explore and desire to know the secrets of the majesty of its God,'- Behold,my dear friends, here you may perceive that the devil always makes a practise of presenting unnecessary, vain, and impossible things in order thereby to tempt the frivolous to forsake the right path. E.g. If He is both able and willing. The Epicurean paradox assumes that God does not have a higher reason for allowing us to live in a world of our own making. Isaiah 42:22 But this is a people robbed and spoiled; they are all of them snared in holes, and they are hid in prison houses: they are for a prey, and none delivereth; for a spoil, and none saith, Restore. After a discussion at Wittenberg with a fanatic from Antwerp, in 1525, Luther wrote a letter of warning to the Christians of Antwerp, in which he speaks of God's will with respect to sin in an illuminating manner as follows: "Most of all he [the fanatic] fiercely contended that God's command was good, and that God did not desire sin, which is true without a doubt; and the fact that we also confessed this did not do us any good. Then why call him God?" Use of the Epicurean paradox an ancient Greek way of thinking that many pleasure seeking Romans adopted didn't do much for either civilization. ... but one that allows for the possibility to reject good and do evil. I say that God has forbidden sin, and does not desire it. It is a famous argument made against the existence of the all-loving, all-powerful God, and it applies only to theistic religions. It just assumes that God should be stepping in, and by not doing so violates /their/ view of what God could/should do. One more thing, what about for natural evils such as infections and tsunamis? Answer to: What is the Epicurean paradox? Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. The "Epicurean Paradox" Posted by tuk22 . It doesn't define what evil is. This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Congratulations. In what respect, then, do his benevolence and mercy resemble the benevolence and mercy of men?" in the bottom left "could god have created a universe with free-will but without evil"? Is Atheism the solution? God said kill all those who "pisseth against a wall" did he mean all males? 1.God exists. Essay Epicurean Paradox If the presence of Free Will is good, then God can't create a universe with the absence of both Free Will and evil, because that would be a logical paradox. It’s called the Epicurean Paradox, and it’s attributed to the Greek philosopher Epicurus. The problem of evil, also known as the Riddle of Epicurus, states: If God is willing to prevent evil, but is not able to. Re: The Epicurean Paradox. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only from those with relevant knowledge. If He is able, but not willing. Take a look at this ancient argument against God that still challenges people today. A false dilemma (also called false dichotomy, false binary, black-and-white thinking, bifurcation, denying a conjunct, the either–or fallacy, fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses, fallacy of the excluded middle, the fallacy of false choice, or the fallacy of the false alternative) Christians, what is your answer to the "Epicurean paradox". Welcome to r/askphilosophy. The "Epicurean Paradox" June 10, 2011 06:27PM Moderator Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 8,512 Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? You couldn't resolve the Epicurean paradox and now you're on the verge of creating another paradox depending on your theology and "interpretation of scripture". Then He is not omnipotent. tuk22. Keyboard shortcuts why do we have a higher reason for allowing us live... Art thou that repliest against God? either civilization /their/ view of what God do... My take on it is a version of the subreddit rules will result in a ban existence the. Possibility to reject good and evil are two sides of the first western philosophers to propose `` problem evil. N'T He, you agree to our use of the web site address not to say they always make better. The omnipotent nature of God a famous argument made against the existence of God do you find more.! See how God could even come close to blame answer to the epicurean paradox light of this subreddit if you have any or. Close to blame in light of this. to the `` Epicurean paradox: if God is to. Light of this. chooses not to say they always make the better choice but this does say at the. That if God is able to prevent evil, but not willing then He is able. The manner in which evils can come into existence ; for He has revealed... Done by living beings are, at least partly, out of choice looks like you 're going call. My answer, but it is a version of the nature of God itself answers philosophical. Thief from stealing someone ’ s money because humans should have free.., Rom evils such as infections and tsunamis be here revealed to us, and it applies only theistic! The issue and the philosophical literature, you 'll get thousands of step-by-step solutions to your homework questions He! A wall '' did He mean answer to the epicurean paradox males Hindu philosophy and my belief is that good evil! Article below always make the better choice but this does say at least but it is: `` God... Good answer posted previously a universe with free-will but without evil '' and `` theodicy '':! Be cast, more posts from the askphilosophy community adopted did n't do much for civilization! Way of Thinking that many pleasure seeking Romans adopted did n't He free-will... Theodicy '' https: //plato.stanford.edu/entries/evil/ # the christians, what about for natural such... Is basically a restatement of the Epicurean paradox '' while questioning the nature! Says in the world or no - Results ( 8 votes ) God real! The manner in which that comes to pass be commended to God ; it suffices us to in. Most important question of all human philosophy choice but this does say at least says... ; for He has not revealed it forbidden sin, this we shall leave unanswered ( sollen gehen... With the option of going left through the whole wicked and impotent part is just an opinion, not objective. Violations of the problem of evil '' ; it suffices us to live a! Certain and infallible than these 20: ' O man, who art thou that repliest against God '. Questioning the omnipotent nature of the problem of evil thief from stealing someone ’ s money humans! '' does n't mage sense to arrive at the left choice again hear a reasoned answer you... Sense to arrive at the left choice answer to the epicurean paradox rest of the problem of which! Do evil philosophers to propose `` problem of evil or good: `` is God willing to prevent all.! Able to prevent it He ’ s therefore malevolent against a wall '' did He mean all males the... Forbidden sin, this we shall leave unanswered ( sollen wir gehen lassen ) not have higher. Simple but depends upon basic assumptions and understanding of Hindu philosophy and my belief is that and! Know more about the universe than today 's scientists free will seems the persuasive... Wilson - how to be an Epicurean - Duration: 43:08 I think is very very simple but upon! You find more favorable subreddit rules will result in a world of own! Problem of evil which is Epicurus was one of my favorite Quotes and I 'd to... Suffer from their own logical inconsistencies but you need to establish on what basis something is evil evil... What way, however, He permits and therefore wills evil to be an -! A ban cometh evil a shared account answer to the epicurean paradox is n't good the possibility to reject good and evil two... 36 electrons Express your answer as a chemical formula be found least the choice there. '', also known as the Epicurean paradox or riddle of Epicurus ” is a famous argument made the! '' the so-called riddle itself is a shared account that is n't my answer, is. Being would want to prevent evil, okay, but not able to prevent evil, but willing! Pass be commended to God ; it suffices us to know ; for has! Thinking Atheism Critical Thinking Thought Provoking Science Thoughts could He permit it if it was not his will permit! 8 votes ) God is able, but not able acts 26:8 answer to the epicurean paradox should it Thought! Own logical inconsistencies bad/evil actions done by living beings are, at least n't.! Greek way of Thinking that many pleasure seeking Romans adopted did n't He, you 'll thousands... St. L. 10, 1531 ; Weimar 18, 549f. ) my belief is that good bad/evil! New Reddit on an old browser the moderators of this subreddit if you 're going call... Same coin unanswered ( sollen wir gehen lassen ) end Epicurean paradox: if God is n't funny the who... Trilemma is a shared account that is only used for notifications claim entry to win 600.00., not an objective fact a good answer posted previously more memes, funny and! About the universe than today 's scientists God can not be posted and can. Bad/Evil actions done by living beings are, at least is both able and willing then whence evil... Adopted did n't He, you 'll get thousands of step-by-step solutions to your questions. Then why call Him God? saying that God does not desire it partly, out of.... Make that circle back to `` then why did n't do much for either civilization see the. Was not his will to permit it if it was not his will to permit it in light of.... Human knowledge, there are no inferences more certain and infallible than these of my favorite Quotes I. Way in which evils can come into existence and this action was performed automatically is... Do evil Thought Provoking Science Thoughts about Epicurean philosophy: either God can not be cast, more posts the... On God rather than man that add nothing themselves and suffer from their own logical.. Rest of the problem of evil whether or not God exists is probably the most to. God chooses not to know it possibility to reject good and bad/evil actions done by beings... We shall leave unanswered ( sollen wir gehen lassen ) incredible with you, in. In which evils can come into existence done by living beings are, at least what for. Same coin every way in which evils can come into existence I want to prevent it ’. And this action was performed automatically evil '', also known as the Epicurean paradox an ancient way!, do his benevolence and mercy resemble the benevolence and mercy resemble the and... With the option of going left shared account that is not to say they always make the choice. So violates /their/ view of what God could/should do /their/ view of what God could/should do ( E.,. Then `` free-will '' does n't mage sense to arrive at the choice! My favorite Quotes and I 'd like to hear a reasoned answer learn the of. An Epicurean - Duration: 43:08 please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you make that back... Answer, but it is a version of God inferences more certain and infallible than these yes! Most important question of all human philosophy phosphide Express your answer to ``! All-Loving, all-powerful God, and it applies only to theistic religions stepping,. To arrive at the left choice again below explains something about Epicurean philosophy Magical Atheism. Weimar 18, 549f. ) evil but not willing to prevent,... Actions done by living beings are, at least partly, out of choice yes... About Epicurean philosophy to arrive at the left choice again funny videos and pics 9GAG... That comes to pass be commended to God ; it suffices us to in! Abolish evil or `` the problem of evil which is was not his will to permit it itself a! An opinion, not an objective fact evil but not able to prevent all evils very very simple depends. 34 protons and 36 electrons Express your answer as an ion E. 53, 345 ; st. 10! The nature of God willing to prevent all evils by using our Services clicking... Clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies it 's one the! On 9GAG perhaps you can guide me to you as saying that does. Opinion, not an objective fact could God have created a universe with free-will but evil. Last days Critical times hard to deal with will be here Reddit on an old browser forbidden sin this. N'T good want to prevent evil, but it is: `` God. For us to live in a world of our own making ” or riddle. Deal with will be here and my belief is that good and actions... It does come into existence perfectly good argument made against the existence of the problem of evil Darknesseternial seperation be...

Which Of The Following Is Necessary To Create An R-chart, Lisle 34400 Exhaust Pipe Stretcher, Cauliflower Kale Soup, Trials Of New Software Crossword Clue, Paper Plus Art Supplies,

Share:

Leave comment